I have been trying to find a church, which is not a little difficult. Today, I almost went to this church that sounded different–engaged in their faith and their community and not tied down to forms birthed out of tradition. But as I read through their website I found a link to a friend site, The Center for Progressive Christianity. In short, I discovered that they consider Jesus
one of many ways to God, going so far as to say,
By calling ourselves progressive, we mean we are Christians who…recognize the faithfulness of other people who have other names for the way to God’s realm, and acknowledge that their ways are true for them, as our ways are true for us.
Now, I am all down for considering what is true for me and true for you and true for us and true for them; but just a little more important to me is the question: what is true for God?
I don’t feel any need to question their faith or their doctrine in terms of their standing with Jesus; however, that’s just not my cup of tea.
The other churches I have been to in Louisville who seem to be more engaged in their faith and community tend to be a little more on the other end of the spectrum. Just by listening to the way they talk, mental images are conjured of sharp angles, clear lines, and high, impenetrable stone walls. They like to talk about hell, sin, and Jesus. Those are all great things to talk about, it’s just how they do it…it’s very rigid from a standpoint of exegetical superiority due to a false assumption of the correct approach to the Scriptures. I had a conversation with one of these guys once about politics, something I know very little about so I am often willing to hear the thoughts of others. I asked him how he votes; he said, “Biblical.” Biblical to him didn’t mean a process of discernment and prayer and waiting for God’s lead; it didn’t even mean casting lots or laying out a sheepskin or some other mystical thing that they actually did in the stories of the Bible; no, Biblical meant John McCain.
I feel stuck between two ill-fitting options. One says, I just don’t feel like this can be true, so it must not be true. The other, Who cares how you feel? This is the truth. Both seem to be engaging this culture and my generation in particular. Both have forms of worship and faith expression that are unique and effective. Both seem to mobilize their people in their faith. But their theological approach and content are at the polar ends. I’m looking for more of a mix, something in between. To complicate matters, I also think I’m searching for something that has shared life at its center instead of a worship experience. Shared life in intentional community includes worship experiences whereas worship experiences do not always include shared life or intentionality.
I made the illustration at the top of this post almost exactly two years ago to express my feelings at the time. I dusted it off today only to realize I am still searching for the same thing. I hope to go into detail about it in three or four parts (Technical Problems & Professionalism; A New Law; A New Gospel; and Adaptive Community) over the next few posts as it encompasses several ideas that are precious to me and help toward constructing an idea of how I would like church to look.
3 December 2008 at 1:56 am
Hi, Chris
I know what you mean. (I can’t read many of the words in your illustration, so I’m talking only about what you’ve said.) I’ve longed for and looked for community in “institutional churches” for a very long time. I think it does exist to varying degrees, but if you find it, you will have found an extremely rare bird. And chances are, the church that looks like community to you will not look that way to others who wander in, but don’t happen to be the right age, professional level, political party, doctrinal persuasion, etc.
We finally gave up on it. Our family is simply “doing church” together. We’re open and desirous of welcoming others into our little circle, but for now I suspect that God is training us to flow together in His Spirit, and when we get the hang of it, He’ll introduce other brothers and sisters. In the mean time, our nuclear family has drawn a lot closer both to each other and to Him. That’s always something to rejoice over.
God bless,
Cindy
4 December 2008 at 1:37 pm
You’re right about the rare bird, Cindy–it feels like a mythical creature. Sometimes I worry that perhaps I have ridiculous standards or hopes and just need to settle.
How long has your family been doing church together? What does it look like? Do you ever feel guilty about not being a part of some local church? I don’t think you should feel that way, but I know I feel a twinge of guilt when I’m not connected to a church.
Well, just so you know, you can click on the illustration to see a larger and much more legible version of it. But it may not make a lot of sense yet anyway, as I will be explaining it more in a few future posts.
Always enjoying your insights,
Chris
6 December 2008 at 7:25 pm
Hi, Chris
No, I don’t think any of us feel guilty. And we are connected to the church. We are the church.
We’ve only been doing this for a few months. My husband switching jobs and having to work most Sundays was the final stimulus. Sometimes we have a communion supper, usually we read–sometimes from the Bible, sometimes from other Christian books, discuss, pray, sing–whatever happens next. Sometimes it flows and other times it feels awkward, but we’re learning. It was pretty hard at first, but it’s getting to where things seem to fall together more easily.
I did click the illustration, and was able to read some of the larger words. Maybe I need to borrow my husband’s reading glasses.
I’m looking forward to getting my new body . . . just not too soon.
God bless,
Cindy
28 December 2008 at 8:12 pm
[...] is a continuation of my previous two posts Life Between Poles .i. Introduction and Life Between Poles .1. Technical Problems. I’m going to take a moment and discuss the two [...]